+- CoreBOSBB (https://discussions.corebos.org)
+-- Forum: Support (https://discussions.corebos.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: Administrator Support (https://discussions.corebos.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Simulate value for payments (/showthread.php?tid=1468)
Simulate value for payments - rslemer - 04-15-2019
I have a situation
My user need simulate a final value in payments, depends on a kind of payments ( because your costs )
Example
If payments in cash, not is necessary calculate a cost and not is necessary, in negotiation, any value in consumer final value for payments
But if, payments will be Credit Card ( and in Brazil is possible divide total value in month payments ) has a cost for this
In this case, user needs, simulate, various values with client ( normally in phone call )
What kind of solution, we can be suggest me, for create a special block ( without save a registry ) for this kind of problem
In fact, for use, the better is a button like as calculator, when you can put all values and system get a final value for a amount in payments ( but I think it is is most of complicated ... )
RE: Simulate value for payments - joebordes - 04-15-2019
This seems like a job for a spreadsheet. Probably most effective would be an integration with Google sheets or Ethercalc. We have integrations with both lying around
RE: Simulate value for payments - rslemer - 04-25-2019
I created a new application coded in javascript
Better if was possible captured some data from this new window, to coreBOS, is possible?
There any example for starting this coding?
RE: Simulate value for payments - joebordes - 04-26-2019
implement a developer block
RE: Simulate value for payments - joebordes - 04-27-2019
https://youtu.be/aAs2FVJ0veE
RE: Simulate value for payments - rslemer - 04-28-2019
Good video and explanation
I think this I can do, two user requests
1) When Service Contratcs is a specific type, shows a alert message, "Contract Priority"
2) Add a comment block into a new block I was created in service contract module, too