CoreBOSBB
I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - Printable Version

+- CoreBOSBB (https://discussions.corebos.org)
+-- Forum: Support (https://discussions.corebos.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: Administrator Support (https://discussions.corebos.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? (/showthread.php?tid=1682)

Pages: 1 2


RE: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - rslemer - 01-27-2020

ok thank you I understood this part

I did not understand why the system did not set this value, by default ..., or does not allow to define this in the layout editor (suggestion, I know this is inheritance from vtiger ...)


RE: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - joebordes - 01-27-2020

validation maps are much more powerful, there is no need to add anything there


RE: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - rslemer - 01-27-2020

ok, thanks!


RE: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - rslemer - 02-03-2020

(01-27-2020, 10:34 PM)joebordes Wrote: validation maps are much more powerful, there is no need to add anything there

Create a validation map for each field? 

I agree with you is more powerful but is lot of work, create a bp for each field ....


RE: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - joebordes - 02-03-2020

for each field? isn't just one map with as many fields as you need to specify (which are not all)?


RE: I can made a change into field tam size directly in database? - rslemer - 02-03-2020

ok, but this way, sounds strange for me ...

Because, I use a layout editor to created a field, type, mandatory, etc but not possible to check the size
For that I should created a validation map ( ok, not is a big problem )

In my install, I has more than 200 custom field, in all modules ...

If i will created a business map ( unique ) probably is to greater and not simple to do that, ( xml is a good tools, but only 1 wrong character tuned all code no effect .. )

Perhaps, at actual moment, is a transition, from older way to did things, to do the new way ...